|




|

A
Visit to the Northeast Judging Center
by
Marianna Max
We've
all seen the funny capital letter combinations added to the end of
some of our favorite orchid species and hybrids, for example, AM,
FCC or HCC. Most of us know that this signifies that the plant or
in some cases, the grower of that plant, has received an award
from the AOS to recognize some aspect of the flower or growth or
cultural excellence. Some of us have even seen such awards being
given to orchids at shows. However many of our members have never
been to a judging center to watch orchids being judged. Bob
Mieliwocki and I went to the Northeast Judging Center in Elmsford
New York on a Saturday morning (third Saturday of the month) to
watch this process in action.
We
arrived at 10am at the Hampton Inn on rt 119 just off of 287 in
Elmsford NY. Rita Cohen called the meeting to order. The first
event of the day this day was a workshop presented by certified
judge and past NJOS member, Ray Waksmundski. The topic was how to
avoid making errors in selecting slides and awards for comparing
present day orchids to those awarded in the past. Sometimes less
experienced student judges make the mistake of paying less
attention to the information about awards that were given earlier
than to those that were awarded more recently. There is a tendency
to assume that later awards are generally better plants (or they
wouldnt have received an award since awards are generally given
for improvements in form or size or color of the flower). Research
into a potential present day award consists of reviewing the past
awards as well as comparing the plant to an ideal image of what
that particular flower should look like. If a cross has received
many previous awards, this can be a daunting task even for an
experienced judge. The name "Ooops factor" was coined to
describe those times when the best example of a previous award is
missed in presenting a plant for review.
Next
in the days events was a presentation by student judge, Dennis
Dayan, whom most of us know as president of Deep Cut Orchid
Society. Dennis gave an interesting slide presentation showing the
contributions of Miltonia spectabilis and its color varieties to
the breeding of the intergeneric hybrids making up Vuylstekeara.
Dennis illustrated the good characteristics contributed by
spectabilis, especially the intense color and markings of the lip
brought to the breeding especially by the variety moreliana. He
also discussed the less desirable trait of crowded flower
presentation that occurs in many of these crosses. He showed how
contributions of other species could help space the flowers more
pleasingly along the inflorescence and could increase the flower
count. He concluded by pointing out some future directions for
this breeding program. Presentations such as these are a normal
part of training of each student and probationary judge. Our new
president John Sullivan is in charge of coordinating training for
student and probationary judges for the Elmsford branch of the
Northeast Judging Center. Typically future accredited judges start
as clerks where they are exposed to the judging process for one to
several years. Then they may progress to the level of student
judge where they learn about all aspects of judging over the
course of a minimum of 3 years but no more than 5 years. If they
successfully navigate this phase of judging they are promoted to
the level of probationary judge. Finally in 3 to 5 years as a
probationary judge and much more hard work and study they may
become accredited judges. This process is entirely voluntary and
is not monetarily compensated. Accredited judges are the backbone
of AOS judging as well as for most ribbon judging for shows.
Diane
Strack, an accredited judge with the center, was up next and she
showed slides of recent awards of orchids from all over the
country. Sometimes the characteristics of what made the plant an
awardable plant were briefly discussed. This review is a regular
feature of the monthly judging and contributes to the education of
students, probationary and long time judges alike. It was
interesting to see the diverse species and hybrids receiving
awards over the last few months.
After
a lunch break, the main business of the day began. This was the
judging of the orchids brought into the center for that day. John
had already assigned plants to each student or probationary judge
to research. The clerk displays each plant for the judges while
the student or probationary judge describes previous awards and
shows some of the slides of awarded plants. The presenter points
out the good points of the flower and also notes any flaws in form
or color in comparison to previously awarded plants. Students are
encouraged to state whether they would nominate a plant for an
award, and why or why not; probationary judges may nominate. All
Judges including students and probationary judges (except for
those on the reserve team) are then welcome to discuss the plant.
They might expand on or in some cases correct the comments of the
presenter (the reserve team of judges don't comment at this time in
case they are needed later to finalize the score). Often the
discussion is very in depth and very interesting. If the plant is
nominated for an award the judges score it. All of the judges not
on the reserve team (except students and any judge with a conflict
of interest) pass in their scores (students score the nomination
but pass their record to one of their mentor judges for comment).
If the scores are within a six point spread of one another, the
reserve judges also pass in their scores and all of the scores are
tallied. If however, the scores arent within six points of each
other, the reserve team of judges jumps into action and gathers to
judge the plant. Once an award is made, the student or
probationary judge who presented the plant writes an award
description and reads it to the assembly for approval and
suggestions by the rest of the group. Each awarded plant is then
photographed for AOS records.
|
At
this judging session there were 14 plants submitted for
consideration. Of these, seven plants received awards. Encyclia
cordigera var roseum received an HCC of 78 pts. Paph delenatii
recieved an AM of 81 pts. Disa uniflora (a cut flower sent all the
way from South Africa) was awared an HCC of 79pts. Dendrobium
wassellii received a CHM of 83 pts. Den. moschatum (no previous
awards for this species) was awarded a CHM of 82 pts. Sobralia
macrantha possibly violacea (identification pending) was awarded a
CHM of 82 pts. Last but certainly not least, Den Gatton Sunray (pulchellum
x Illustre) received a CCM of 87 pts. Of all of these plants, my
personal favorite was the Den Gatton Sunray. This culture award was given to Dr. Wilford
Neptune, a previous winner of many AOS awards for Den kingianum
and native North American species. This plant lived up to its name
by looking like a Sunray made up of almost 400 golden flowers that
literally obscured the foliage. Look for its photo in an upcoming
Awards Quartely! |

Den.
Gatton Sunray
|
Judging
sessions at the Northeast Judging center are open to the orchid
community and are scheduled for the third Saturday of the month
usually beginning at 10am at the Hampton Inn in Elmsford, NY. For
more information on AOS awards and the judging system check out http://orchidweb.org/ and click on calendar of events and then the
judging system. You might also read the AOS publication, Handbook
of Judging and Exhibition, which we have available in our library.
|
|